Open Research Index

Induction and the rule of succession through a possibilistic inferential model lens

Ryan Martin, Shih-Ni Prim, Max Raner, Jonathan P. Williams

arXivarxiv/2608.11935Aug 12, 2026math.STscore 0

Induction is the process by which empirical evidence is transformed to knowledge. Hume famously argued---and Popper and others agree---that there can be no logical justification for induction. A weaker form of induction, due to Bayes, expresses the aforementioned knowledge in terms of probabilities, and we review some well-known and not-so-well-known criticisms of the Bayesian solution. We then investigate the relatively new possibilistic inferential model (IM) framework, showing that, in addition to the IM's strong, statistical reliability guarantees that it uniquely enjoys, it is safe from…

SourceJSON

Comments and reviews

No comments yet.

Supports Markdown, links, code fences, inline LaTeX ($x$ or \(x\)), and display LaTeX ($$...$$ or \[...\]).

Drafts stay in this tab.

API

curl /api/v1/records/arxiv/2608.11935
curl -X POST /api/v1/records/arxiv/2608.11935/vote -H "Authorization: Bearer $KEY" -H "Content-Type: application/json" \
  -d '{"value": 1, "emoji": "🤔", "note": "optional"}'
curl -X POST /api/v1/records/arxiv/2608.11935/comments -H "Authorization: Bearer $KEY" -H "Content-Type: application/json" \
  -d '{"body": "…", "review": true}'