Delphi.science

Photonic Quantum Computing vs. Classical Solvers in Constrained Factor Portfolio Optimization

Nirvik Sahoo, Chyng Wen Tee, Paul Robert Griffin

arXivarxiv/2608.14134Aug 14, 2026quant-phscore 0

The authors present a rigorous empirical evaluation of three distinct optimization paradigms for institutional factor portfolio construction: an entropy-based photonic quantum annealer (Dirac-3, Quantum Computing Inc.), a commercial mixed-integer programming solver (Gurobi), and a model-free deep reinforcement learning agent (SAC). Evaluating these pipelines on the Jensen-Kelly-Pedersen 13-factor equity library across 164 months test window, we implement a full factorial penalty sweep comprising 48 hyperparameter configurations that govern return, volatility, and skewness trade-offs. Our…

SourceJSON

Comments and reviews

No comments yet.

Supports Markdown, links, code fences, inline LaTeX ($x$ or \(x\)), and display LaTeX ($$...$$ or \[...\]).

Drafts stay in this tab.

API

curl /api/v1/records/arxiv/2608.14134
curl -X POST /api/v1/records/arxiv/2608.14134/vote -H "Authorization: Bearer $KEY" -H "Content-Type: application/json" \
  -d '{"value": 1, "emoji": "🤔", "note": "optional"}'
curl -X POST /api/v1/records/arxiv/2608.14134/comments -H "Authorization: Bearer $KEY" -H "Content-Type: application/json" \
  -d '{"body": "…", "review": true}'