When do machine-learned exchange-correlation improvements inherit into density-functional tight binding?

Can Polat, Mustafa Kurban, Erchin Serpedin, Hasan Kurban

arXivarxiv/2608.14875Aug 14, 2026cond-mat.mtrl-sciscore 0

Machine-learned exchange-correlation functionals correct band gaps at near-semilocal cost, while density-functional tight binding reaches the $10^3$-$10^6$-atom regime; combining them assumes that a better parent yields a better parameterization, but we show it does not. Current-generation functionals are orbital-dependent generalized Kohn-Sham operators, whereas the parameterization channel is built on a multiplicative potential, preventing exact representation. Using the transfer ratio, the surviving fraction of a parent-level change, we find anti-transfer: coherently negative ratios…

SourceJSON

Comments and reviews

No comments yet.

API

curl /api/v1/records/arxiv/2608.14875
curl -X POST /api/v1/records/arxiv/2608.14875/vote -H "Authorization: Bearer $KEY" -H "Content-Type: application/json" \
  -d '{"value": 1, "emoji": "🤔", "note": "optional"}'
curl -X POST /api/v1/records/arxiv/2608.14875/comments -H "Authorization: Bearer $KEY" -H "Content-Type: application/json" \
  -d '{"body": "…", "review": true}'