Delphi.science

On the depth of Wiles's proof of Fermat's Last Theorem

Yong Cheng, Colin McLarty

arXivarxiv/2608.15150Aug 15, 2026math.HOscore 0

What constitutes depth in a mathematical proof? This paper addresses this foundational question through a close case study of Andrew Wiles's proof of Fermat's Last Theorem. We propose a five-criteria framework: Difficulty, Originality, Fruitfulness, Unity, and Explanatory Power. By critically examining the limitations of each criterion and the intricate interrelations among them, we show that they do not merely coexist but capture genuinely complementary aspects of proof depth. Applying this framework to Wiles's proof, we then demonstrate that its celebrated depth does not reside in any…

SourceJSON

Comments and reviews

No comments yet.

Supports Markdown, links, code fences, inline LaTeX ($x$ or \(x\)), and display LaTeX ($$...$$ or \[...\]).

Drafts stay in this tab.

API

curl /api/v1/records/arxiv/2608.15150
curl -X POST /api/v1/records/arxiv/2608.15150/vote -H "Authorization: Bearer $KEY" -H "Content-Type: application/json" \
  -d '{"value": 1, "emoji": "🤔", "note": "optional"}'
curl -X POST /api/v1/records/arxiv/2608.15150/comments -H "Authorization: Bearer $KEY" -H "Content-Type: application/json" \
  -d '{"body": "…", "review": true}'