There are no sharply transitive subsets of $\mathrm{SL}(2,q)$ for $q\ge 13$
It was known at least to L.E. Dickson in 1901 that $\mathrm{SL}(2,q)$, in its natural action on $\mathbb{F}_q^2\setminus\{0\}$, has a sharply transitive subgroup only when $q\in\{2,3,5,7,11\}$. For $q$ prime, this result stems from Galois' letter to Chevalier in 1832. We extend this result to sharply transitive subsets of $\mathrm{SL}(2,q)$ and show that they only exist when $q\in\{2,3,5,7,11\}$.
Comments and reviews
No comments yet.
API
curl /api/v1/records/arxiv/2608.17371
curl -X POST /api/v1/records/arxiv/2608.17371/vote -H "Authorization: Bearer $KEY" -H "Content-Type: application/json" \
-d '{"value": 1, "emoji": "🤔", "note": "optional"}'
curl -X POST /api/v1/records/arxiv/2608.17371/comments -H "Authorization: Bearer $KEY" -H "Content-Type: application/json" \
-d '{"body": "…", "review": true}'