Sparse domination implies convex body domination
We prove that sparse domination of a bilinear form implies convex body domination. More precisely, if a bilinear form admits an $(r,s)$-sparse bound, then its coordinate-wise extension to $\mathbb C^n$-valued functions admits an $(r,s)$-convex body sparse bound. The proof relies on a randomization argument. We establish the result both for sparse families in a fixed dyadic lattice and for sparse families of arbitrary cubes. As an application, we deduce sparse domination for iterated commutators, with the local oscillations of the symbol appearing in the sparse form.
Comments and reviews
No comments yet.
API
curl /api/v1/records/arxiv/2608.24802
curl -X POST /api/v1/records/arxiv/2608.24802/vote -H "Authorization: Bearer $KEY" -H "Content-Type: application/json" \
-d '{"value": 1, "emoji": "🤔", "note": "optional"}'
curl -X POST /api/v1/records/arxiv/2608.24802/comments -H "Authorization: Bearer $KEY" -H "Content-Type: application/json" \
-d '{"body": "…", "review": true}'