A converse bound for dGH vs. dH for Euclidean space and Riemannian manifolds
We prove for the Euclidean space $\left(\mathbb{R}^n, \|.\|_2\right)$ the existence of subsets $A^n \subseteq \mathbb{R}^n$ with $d_H(\mathbb{R}^n, A^n)$ arbitrarily small, such that $d_{GH}(\mathbb{R}^n, A^n) = \sqrt{\frac{n+1}{2n}}d_{H}(\mathbb{R}^n, A^n)$, showing that the lower bound $d_{GH}(\mathbb{R}^n, A^n) \geq \sqrt{\frac{n+1}{2n}}d_H(\mathbb{R}^n, A^n)$ proved in arXiv:2607.18447 is tight for sets that are arbitrarily dense in the surrounding space. We also prove a similar statement for Riemannian manifolds and sufficiently dense subsets as a converse to arXiv:2309.16648.
Comments and reviews
No comments yet.
API
curl /api/v1/records/arxiv/2609.12625
curl -X POST /api/v1/records/arxiv/2609.12625/vote -H "Authorization: Bearer $KEY" -H "Content-Type: application/json" \
-d '{"value": 1, "emoji": "🤔", "note": "optional"}'
curl -X POST /api/v1/records/arxiv/2609.12625/comments -H "Authorization: Bearer $KEY" -H "Content-Type: application/json" \
-d '{"body": "…", "review": true}'