The Limits of Arithmetical Pluralism: Incompleteness, Large Cardinals, and Graded Non-Pluralism
Gödelian incompleteness yields arithmetical sentences \(A\) such that \(\mathsf{PA}+A\) and \(\mathsf{PA}+\neg A\) are both consistent. Are such extensions equally legitimate? I propose graded epistemic arithmetical non-pluralism: justification for choosing between them varies with the set-theoretic strength of \(A\). I defend \(\mathsf{PA}+\mathsf{Con}(\mathsf{PA})\) and show that Friedman's concrete incompleteness results pose a serious challenge to non-pluralism about first-order arithmetic. Resolving the selection problem for such sentences turns on justifying large cardinals. Defending…
Comments and reviews
No comments yet.
API
curl /api/v1/records/arxiv/2609.22797
curl -X POST /api/v1/records/arxiv/2609.22797/vote -H "Authorization: Bearer $KEY" -H "Content-Type: application/json" \
-d '{"value": 1, "emoji": "🤔", "note": "optional"}'
curl -X POST /api/v1/records/arxiv/2609.22797/comments -H "Authorization: Bearer $KEY" -H "Content-Type: application/json" \
-d '{"body": "…", "review": true}'