On a Non-Prox-Regularity Example by Rockafellar and Wets
We analyze a counterexample concerning non-prox-regular functions provided by Rockafellar and Wets in their 1998 foundational monograph, \textit{Variational Analysis}. By establishing a general theorem on the continuity of set-valued mappings, we show that the counterexample does not have its intended properties. We propose a slight adjustment to the construction and prove that the corrected version serves as the desired counterexample.
Comments and reviews
No comments yet.
API
curl /api/v1/records/arxiv/2609.23279
curl -X POST /api/v1/records/arxiv/2609.23279/vote -H "Authorization: Bearer $KEY" -H "Content-Type: application/json" \
-d '{"value": 1, "emoji": "🤔", "note": "optional"}'
curl -X POST /api/v1/records/arxiv/2609.23279/comments -H "Authorization: Bearer $KEY" -H "Content-Type: application/json" \
-d '{"body": "…", "review": true}'