Optimal Actuator Design across Ranks and Control Horizons
We study how actuator rank and control horizon jointly determine worst-case control performance for finite-dimensional linear systems under a fixed total actuator-gain budget. The design variable is the input covariance $X=BB^\top$. Scalar actuators give rank-one matrices $X=bb^\top$; dropping the rank constraint yields their convex hull and a semidefinite benchmark. We identify regimes in which low-rank designs necessarily fall short and others in which they attain the benchmark. At small time, the relaxed maximizer is unique and full rank. If $A$ is cyclic, then, for every $k
Comments and reviews
No comments yet.
API
curl /api/v1/records/arxiv/2609.37081
curl -X POST /api/v1/records/arxiv/2609.37081/vote -H "Authorization: Bearer $KEY" -H "Content-Type: application/json" \
-d '{"value": 1, "emoji": "🤔", "note": "optional"}'
curl -X POST /api/v1/records/arxiv/2609.37081/comments -H "Authorization: Bearer $KEY" -H "Content-Type: application/json" \
-d '{"body": "…", "review": true}'