Open Research Index

What Does It Cost to Simulate a Quantum Sentence Classifier? An Energy and Compute Perspective on Near-Term QNLP

Kishlay Kashyap, Sandipan Ganguly

arXivarxiv/2610.06176Oct 5, 2026quant-phscore 0

Near-term quantum natural language processing (QNLP) experiments often run on classical simulators, so simulator cost is part of the field's practical compute burden, yet accuracy tables do not show it. We measure that cost for a variational quantum classifier (VQC) on binary SST-2 sentiment classification, using PennyLane's state-vector simulator over a controlled grid of 27 configurations: three balanced training-set sizes (N = 200, 500, 1000), three qubit counts (4, 6, 8), and three circuit depths. Each VQC is compared with logistic regression on the same PCA-reduced input; full TF-IDF…

SourceJSON

Comments and reviews

No comments yet.

Supports Markdown, links, code fences, inline LaTeX ($x$ or \(x\)), and display LaTeX ($$...$$ or \[...\]).

Drafts stay in this tab.

API

curl /api/v1/records/arxiv/2610.06176
curl -X POST /api/v1/records/arxiv/2610.06176/vote -H "Authorization: Bearer $KEY" -H "Content-Type: application/json" \
  -d '{"value": 1, "emoji": "🤔", "note": "optional"}'
curl -X POST /api/v1/records/arxiv/2610.06176/comments -H "Authorization: Bearer $KEY" -H "Content-Type: application/json" \
  -d '{"body": "…", "review": true}'