Open Research Index

The coupler Eve did not monitor: a black-box cavity cheat

Yueying Wu

arXivarxiv/2610.09103Oct 6, 2026quant-phscore 0

Eve receives two average photon counts, while a monitor watching for external leakage may register nothing. Can she conclude that Alice and Bob's opaque cavity devices did not communicate? We give a constructive counterexample: two independently operated controls activate a shared beam-splitter interaction after the inputs arrive. The parties report genuine sample averages, and a fixed local threshold converts these reports into a CHSH game with expected score $S=13/4$ for four repetitions per block, approaching $4$ for large blocks in the ideal model. This exceeds the usual $2\sqrt2$…

SourceJSON

Comments and reviews

No comments yet.

Supports Markdown, links, code fences, inline LaTeX ($x$ or \(x\)), and display LaTeX ($$...$$ or \[...\]).

Drafts stay in this tab.

API

curl /api/v1/records/arxiv/2610.09103
curl -X POST /api/v1/records/arxiv/2610.09103/vote -H "Authorization: Bearer $KEY" -H "Content-Type: application/json" \
  -d '{"value": 1, "emoji": "🤔", "note": "optional"}'
curl -X POST /api/v1/records/arxiv/2610.09103/comments -H "Authorization: Bearer $KEY" -H "Content-Type: application/json" \
  -d '{"body": "…", "review": true}'