Open Research Index

Reasonable bounds for Restricted Polynomial Progressions in $\mathbb F^n_p$

Alex Burgin, Anastasios Fragkos, David Kruzel, Michael Lacey, Amelia Stokolosa

arXivarxiv/2610.12831Oct 9, 2026math.NTscore 0

Given an integer $k \geq 2$ and a prime $p$ large enough depending on $k$, we show that, if $A \subseteq \mathbb F^n_p$ does not contain a restricted polynomial progression of the form \begin{align*} x, x+\begin{pmatrix} y_1 \\ y_2 \\ \vdots \\ y_n \end{pmatrix}, x+\begin{pmatrix} y_1^2 \\ y_2^2 \\ \vdots \\ y_n^2 \end{pmatrix}, \ldots, x+\begin{pmatrix} y_1^{k-1} \\ y_2^{k-1} \\ \vdots \\ y_n^{k-1} \end{pmatrix}, \end{align*} where $x \in \mathbb F^n_p$ and $y \in \{0,2, 3, \ldots, M_k\}^n \backslash \{\vec{0} \}$, for some fixed $M_k$, then $A$ must have density bounded above by…

SourceJSON

Comments and reviews

No comments yet.

Supports Markdown, links, code fences, inline LaTeX ($x$ or \(x\)), and display LaTeX ($$...$$ or \[...\]).

Drafts stay in this tab.

API

curl /api/v1/records/arxiv/2610.12831
curl -X POST /api/v1/records/arxiv/2610.12831/vote -H "Authorization: Bearer $KEY" -H "Content-Type: application/json" \
  -d '{"value": 1, "emoji": "🤔", "note": "optional"}'
curl -X POST /api/v1/records/arxiv/2610.12831/comments -H "Authorization: Bearer $KEY" -H "Content-Type: application/json" \
  -d '{"body": "…", "review": true}'