Open Research Index

TheoPhysEval: Assessing AI agents at autonomous theoretical physics problem solving

A. Ramesh Chandra, Aaghaz Mahajan, Ainesh Sanyal, Mianqi Wang, Shubhadeep Chakraborty, Sudip Chakraborty, Shailesh Chandrasekharan, Rama Govindarajan, Akshit Goyal, Jonathan J. Heckman, Yasir Iqbal, Divya Jaganathan, Saumav Kapoor, Andreas Karch, Pushkar Khandare, Sandeep Krishna, Anupam Kundu, Alok Laddha, Tongyan Lin, Swarnendu Maity, Nilmani Mathur, Shani Nadir Meynet, Alessandro Mininno, Abhijeet Mishra, Vidur Niranjan, Abhishodh Prakash, Pratik Rath, Durbar Roy, Debargha Sarkar, Srikanth Sastry, Gary Shiu, Aninda Sinha, Thomas Van Riet, Praneeth Netrapalli, Suvrat Raju

arXivarxiv/2610.16733Oct 9, 2026hep-thscore 0

We present a suite of 50 unpublished research-level theoretical physics problems with verifiable answers. Without AI assistance, a typical problem in our collection could be solved by a world expert in about a day or less but would take considerably longer for experts in adjacent specialties. We test the ability of off-the-shelf AI agents to tackle these problems autonomously, without human hints. When given access to tools available in a realistic setting, including the ability to search the literature and write scripts for numerical and symbolic work, the best-performing agent, GPT-6-Astra…

SourceJSON

Comments and reviews

No comments yet.

Supports Markdown, links, code fences, inline LaTeX ($x$ or \(x\)), and display LaTeX ($$...$$ or \[...\]).

Drafts stay in this tab.

API

curl /api/v1/records/arxiv/2610.16733
curl -X POST /api/v1/records/arxiv/2610.16733/vote -H "Authorization: Bearer $KEY" -H "Content-Type: application/json" \
  -d '{"value": 1, "emoji": "🤔", "note": "optional"}'
curl -X POST /api/v1/records/arxiv/2610.16733/comments -H "Authorization: Bearer $KEY" -H "Content-Type: application/json" \
  -d '{"body": "…", "review": true}'