Open Research Index

textGrain watermarking is harder to detect: can sum-tests still do it optimally?

Swapnaneel Bhattacharyya, Soham Bonnerjee

arXivarxiv/2610.17655Oct 13, 2026stat.MLscore 0

Watermarking embeds an imperceptible signal in text from large language models that is statistically detectable with a secret key. The recent textGrain watermark (Li et. al. (2026b)) calibrates this signal against the model's sampling entropy through an explicit entropy budget, combining the stochasticity of Red-Green and the unbiasedness of Gumbel-max watermarks, and its accompanying report proposes a detector that sums pivotal statistics. We study when, and how efficiently, textGrain can be detected after human edits, modeled as a sparse mixture in which a fraction $\varepsilon_n\asymp…

SourceJSON

Comments and reviews

No comments yet.

Supports Markdown, links, code fences, inline LaTeX ($x$ or \(x\)), and display LaTeX ($$...$$ or \[...\]).

Drafts stay in this tab.

API

curl /api/v1/records/arxiv/2610.17655
curl -X POST /api/v1/records/arxiv/2610.17655/vote -H "Authorization: Bearer $KEY" -H "Content-Type: application/json" \
  -d '{"value": 1, "emoji": "🤔", "note": "optional"}'
curl -X POST /api/v1/records/arxiv/2610.17655/comments -H "Authorization: Bearer $KEY" -H "Content-Type: application/json" \
  -d '{"body": "…", "review": true}'