Open Research Index

On Carmichael Numbers Constructed from Consecutive Jacobsthal Numbers

Hayat Bensella

arXivarxiv/2610.26065Oct 19, 2026math.NTscore 0

We prove that no Carmichael number has the form \[ N=(2^mJ_n+1)(2^mJ_{n+1}+1)(2^mJ_{n+2}+1), \] where \[ J_n=\frac{2^n-(-1)^n}{3} \] is the Jacobsthal sequence, \(m,n\ge1\), and all three factors are prime. Assuming that such an \(N\) is Carmichael, Korselt's criterion yields divisibility conditions relating consecutive Jacobsthal numbers to powers of two. Combining these conditions with the Binet formula and a finite case analysis for \(n\le4\), we obtain a contradiction. Consequently, this family contains no Carmichael numbers.

SourceJSON

Comments and reviews

No comments yet.

Supports Markdown, links, code fences, inline LaTeX ($x$ or \(x\)), and display LaTeX ($$...$$ or \[...\]).

Drafts stay in this tab.

API

curl /api/v1/records/arxiv/2610.26065
curl -X POST /api/v1/records/arxiv/2610.26065/vote -H "Authorization: Bearer $KEY" -H "Content-Type: application/json" \
  -d '{"value": 1, "emoji": "🤔", "note": "optional"}'
curl -X POST /api/v1/records/arxiv/2610.26065/comments -H "Authorization: Bearer $KEY" -H "Content-Type: application/json" \
  -d '{"body": "…", "review": true}'