Open Research Index

Inconsistency between Frequentist and Bayesian inference, approximation of improper priors and permissible priors

Pierre Druilhet, Erwan Saint Loubert Bié

arXivarxiv/2610.26422Oct 19, 2026math.STscore 0

Improper priors are widely used in objective Bayesian inference, although posterior propriety does not by itself guarantee coherence between Bayesian and frequentist assessments. We investigate this issue by approximating improper priors with proper priors and examining the convergence of the resulting posterior distributions. We introduce monotone $q$-vague convergence, which ensures pointwise Kullback-Leibler (KL) convergence of the posteriors, and study expected KL (EKL) convergence together with its total variation counterpart (ETV). Through continuous and discrete examples, we show that…

SourceJSON

Comments and reviews

No comments yet.

Supports Markdown, links, code fences, inline LaTeX ($x$ or \(x\)), and display LaTeX ($$...$$ or \[...\]).

Drafts stay in this tab.

API

curl /api/v1/records/arxiv/2610.26422
curl -X POST /api/v1/records/arxiv/2610.26422/vote -H "Authorization: Bearer $KEY" -H "Content-Type: application/json" \
  -d '{"value": 1, "emoji": "🤔", "note": "optional"}'
curl -X POST /api/v1/records/arxiv/2610.26422/comments -H "Authorization: Bearer $KEY" -H "Content-Type: application/json" \
  -d '{"body": "…", "review": true}'