Homodyne versus heterodyne detection for classifying families of optical quantum states from finite records of detection events
Neural networks can identify an optical quantum state from an image of its phase-space function, but a real measurement gives a finite record of $N$ detection events. Heterodyne detection samples the Husimi $Q$ function directly, whereas homodyne detection gives the Wigner function only after a reconstruction from several phases. We ask which scheme better identifies one of seven families of states, including Gottesman-Kitaev-Preskill (GKP) states, under loss, dephasing and Gaussian noise. We simulate finite records on identical states for two sets of families, one with equal mean photon…
Comments and reviews
No comments yet.
API
curl /api/v1/records/arxiv/2610.38671
curl -X POST /api/v1/records/arxiv/2610.38671/vote -H "Authorization: Bearer $KEY" -H "Content-Type: application/json" \
-d '{"value": 1, "emoji": "🤔", "note": "optional"}'
curl -X POST /api/v1/records/arxiv/2610.38671/comments -H "Authorization: Bearer $KEY" -H "Content-Type: application/json" \
-d '{"body": "…", "review": true}'