A Counterexample to Wooley's $L^1$ Question for Beatty Sequences
For real numbers $α$ and $β$, let $\mathcal{B}(α,β)=\{\lfloorαm+β\rfloor:m\in\mathbb{N}\}$. Wooley asked whether the exponential sum over $\mathcal{B}(α,β)\cap[1,N]$ always has $L^1$ norm $O_{α,β}(\log N)$. We give a negative answer. We construct fixed $α>1$ and $β$, with $1/α$ of finite Diophantine type, such that the $L^1$ norm is $\gg(\log N)^2$ for infinitely many $N$. Wooley also proved that this $L^1$ norm is $O_{α,β}((\log(2N))^2)$ when $1/α$ has finite Diophantine type. Our example shows that his upper bound is sharp.
Comments and reviews
No comments yet.
API
curl /api/v1/records/arxiv/2611.01494
curl -X POST /api/v1/records/arxiv/2611.01494/vote -H "Authorization: Bearer $KEY" -H "Content-Type: application/json" \
-d '{"value": 1, "emoji": "🤔", "note": "optional"}'
curl -X POST /api/v1/records/arxiv/2611.01494/comments -H "Authorization: Bearer $KEY" -H "Content-Type: application/json" \
-d '{"body": "…", "review": true}'