Quantum vs. Classical Machine Learning: A Benchmark Study for Financial Prediction

Rehan Ahmad, Muhammad Kashif, Nouhaila Innan, Muhammad Shafique

arXivarxiv/2601.03802Jan 7, 2026cs.LGscore 0

In this paper, we present a reproducible benchmarking framework that systematically compares QML models with architecture-matched classical counterparts across three financial tasks: (i) directional return prediction on U.S. and Turkish equities, (ii) live-trading simulation with Quantum LSTMs versus classical LSTMs on the S\&P 500, and (iii) realized volatility forecasting using Quantum Support Vector Regression. By standardizing data splits, features, and evaluation metrics, our study provides a fair assessment of when current-generation QML models can match or exceed classical methods.…

SourceJSON

Comments and reviews

No comments yet.

API

curl /api/v1/records/arxiv/2601.03802
curl -X POST /api/v1/records/arxiv/2601.03802/vote -H "Authorization: Bearer $KEY" -H "Content-Type: application/json" \
  -d '{"value": 1, "emoji": "🤔", "note": "optional"}'
curl -X POST /api/v1/records/arxiv/2601.03802/comments -H "Authorization: Bearer $KEY" -H "Content-Type: application/json" \
  -d '{"body": "…", "review": true}'