Comparing and correcting robustness metrics for quantum optimal control

Andrew T. Kamen, Samuel Fine, Bikrant Bhattacharyya, Frederic T. Chong, Andy J. Goldschmidt

arXivarxiv/2602.10349Feb 10, 2026quant-phscore 0

Control pulses that nominally optimize fidelity are sensitive to routine hardware drift and modeling errors. Robust quantum optimal control seeks error-insensitive control pulses that maintain fidelity thresholds and obey hardware constraints. Distinct numerical approximations to the first-order error susceptibility include adjoint end-point and toggling-frame approaches. Although theoretically equivalent, we provide a novel, systematic study demonstrating important numerical differences between these two approaches. We also introduce a critical discretization correction to the widely-used…

SourceJSON

Comments and reviews

No comments yet.

API

curl /api/v1/records/arxiv/2602.10349
curl -X POST /api/v1/records/arxiv/2602.10349/vote -H "Authorization: Bearer $KEY" -H "Content-Type: application/json" \
  -d '{"value": 1, "emoji": "🤔", "note": "optional"}'
curl -X POST /api/v1/records/arxiv/2602.10349/comments -H "Authorization: Bearer $KEY" -H "Content-Type: application/json" \
  -d '{"body": "…", "review": true}'