Open Research Index

Quantum Error Correction and Dynamical Decoupling: Better Together or Apart?

Victor Kasatkin, Mario Morford-Oberst, Arian Vezvaee, Daniel A. Lidar

arXivarxiv/2602.19042Feb 22, 2026quant-phscore 0

Quantum error correction/detection (QEC/QED) and dynamical decoupling (DD) are tools for protecting quantum information. A natural goal is to combine them to outperform either approach alone. Such a benefit is not automatic: physical DD can conflict with encoded subspace, and QEC performance is governed by the errors that survive decoding, not just those DD suppresses. We analyze a hybrid memory cycle where DD is implemented logically (LDD) using normalizer elements of an $[[n,k,d]]$ stabilizer code, followed by a round of syndrome measurement and recovery (or, in the detection setting,…

SourceJSON

Comments and reviews

No comments yet.

Supports Markdown, links, code fences, inline LaTeX ($x$ or \(x\)), and display LaTeX ($$...$$ or \[...\]).

Drafts stay in this tab.

API

curl /api/v1/records/arxiv/2602.19042
curl -X POST /api/v1/records/arxiv/2602.19042/vote -H "Authorization: Bearer $KEY" -H "Content-Type: application/json" \
  -d '{"value": 1, "emoji": "🤔", "note": "optional"}'
curl -X POST /api/v1/records/arxiv/2602.19042/comments -H "Authorization: Bearer $KEY" -H "Content-Type: application/json" \
  -d '{"body": "…", "review": true}'