Equivalence testing with data-dependent and post-hoc equivalence margins
Equivalence testing compares the hypothesis that an effect $μ$ is large against the alternative that it is negligible. Here, `large' is classically expressed as being larger than some `equivalence margin' $Δ$. A longstanding problem is that this margin must be specified but can rarely be objectively justified in practice. We lay the foundation for an alternative paradigm, arguing to instead report a data-dependent margin $\widehatΔ_α$ that bounds the true effect $μ$ with probability $1 - α$. Our key argument is that $\widehatΔ_α$ is more useful than a test outcome at a fixed margin $Δ$, as…
Comments and reviews
No comments yet.
API
curl /api/v1/records/arxiv/2603.16213
curl -X POST /api/v1/records/arxiv/2603.16213/vote -H "Authorization: Bearer $KEY" -H "Content-Type: application/json" \
-d '{"value": 1, "emoji": "🤔", "note": "optional"}'
curl -X POST /api/v1/records/arxiv/2603.16213/comments -H "Authorization: Bearer $KEY" -H "Content-Type: application/json" \
-d '{"body": "…", "review": true}'