Open Research Index

ABC implies that Ramanujan's tau function misses almost all primes

David Kurniadi Angdinata, Evan Chen, Chris Cummins, Ben Eltschig, Dejan Grubisic, Leopold Haller, Letong Hong, Andranik Kurghinyan, Kenny Lau, Hugh Leather, Seewoo Lee, Simon Mahns, Aram H. Markosyan, Rithikesh Muddana, Ken Ono, Manooshree Patel, Gaurang Pendharkar, Vedant Rathi, Alex Schneidman, Volker Seeker, Shubho Sengupta, Ishan Sinha, Jimmy Xin, Jujian Zhang

arXivarxiv/2603.29970Mar 31, 2026math.NTscore 0

Lehmer conjectured that Ramanujan's tau-function never vanishes. In a related direction, a folklore conjecture asserts that infinitely many primes arise as absolute values of Ramanujan's tau-function. Recently, Xiong showed that these prime values form a subset of the primes with density at most $2/11$. Assuming the $abc$ Conjecture, we prove the stronger upper bound \[ S(X):=\#\{\ell\le X:\ \ell\ \text{prime and } |τ(n)|=\ell \text{ for some } n\ge 1\} = O(X^{13/22}), \] which implies that Ramanujan's tau-function misses a density 1 subset of the primes. We give a heuristic suggesting that…

SourceJSON

Comments and reviews

No comments yet.

Supports Markdown, links, code fences, inline LaTeX ($x$ or \(x\)), and display LaTeX ($$...$$ or \[...\]).

Drafts stay in this tab.

API

curl /api/v1/records/arxiv/2603.29970
curl -X POST /api/v1/records/arxiv/2603.29970/vote -H "Authorization: Bearer $KEY" -H "Content-Type: application/json" \
  -d '{"value": 1, "emoji": "🤔", "note": "optional"}'
curl -X POST /api/v1/records/arxiv/2603.29970/comments -H "Authorization: Bearer $KEY" -H "Content-Type: application/json" \
  -d '{"body": "…", "review": true}'