Collective deterrence as a classification problem: Voting rules, deterrence credibility, and escalation risk
Deterrence coalitions that collectively own their deterrence technology, need an institutional design to decide when to retaliate against an attack or incident. This choice of institutional design, formalized through a social choice function, introduces a tradeoff between credible deterrence and escalation risk. We study this tradeoff via a simple signalling model, and use it to construct an associated binary classification problem to determine institutional designs that perform well in a variety of environments. For a small coalition of four members, we compute and study the statistics of…
Comments and reviews
No comments yet.
API
curl /api/v1/records/arxiv/2604.08482
curl -X POST /api/v1/records/arxiv/2604.08482/vote -H "Authorization: Bearer $KEY" -H "Content-Type: application/json" \
-d '{"value": 1, "emoji": "🤔", "note": "optional"}'
curl -X POST /api/v1/records/arxiv/2604.08482/comments -H "Authorization: Bearer $KEY" -H "Content-Type: application/json" \
-d '{"body": "…", "review": true}'