Comments on "Ether of Orbifolds"
We comment on a recent manuscript "Ether of Orbifolds" by Henry Lamm. In the first version, it was mistakenly claimed that the orbifold lattice Hamiltonian is not gauge invariant, and a quantity $ε_g$, which has nothing to do with a non-existent "gauge violation", was introduced. The scaling of this $ε_g$ was used to claim a huge simulation cost. In fact, $ε_g$ characterizes the shift of the effective lattice spacing -- because, in the orbifold lattice formulation, the lattice is generated dynamically from the vacuum expectation value of the complex matrices. In the second version, the claim…
Comments and reviews
No comments yet.
API
curl /api/v1/records/arxiv/2604.08622
curl -X POST /api/v1/records/arxiv/2604.08622/vote -H "Authorization: Bearer $KEY" -H "Content-Type: application/json" \
-d '{"value": 1, "emoji": "🤔", "note": "optional"}'
curl -X POST /api/v1/records/arxiv/2604.08622/comments -H "Authorization: Bearer $KEY" -H "Content-Type: application/json" \
-d '{"body": "…", "review": true}'