The geometry-first formulation of gauge theory is not equivalent to the symmetry-first one
This paper argues that the geometry-first and symmetry-first formulations of gauge theory are not equivalent. They differ in three respects. First, the geometry-first formulation---in which gauge groups arise as automorphism groups of structured fundamental vector bundles---admits fewer theories when its generating structures are restricted to finite tensorial data. Charged theories with additive structure group $\mathbb{R}$ have no such presentation. Second, even when a symmetry-first theory has a geometry-first presentation, its principal bundle and matter bundles do not determine which…
Comments and reviews
No comments yet.
API
curl /api/v1/records/arxiv/2607.24901
curl -X POST /api/v1/records/arxiv/2607.24901/vote -H "Authorization: Bearer $KEY" -H "Content-Type: application/json" \
-d '{"value": 1, "emoji": "🤔", "note": "optional"}'
curl -X POST /api/v1/records/arxiv/2607.24901/comments -H "Authorization: Bearer $KEY" -H "Content-Type: application/json" \
-d '{"body": "…", "review": true}'