Toward Well-Posed Problems in the Social Sciences: Hadamard's Criteria as Epistemic Guardrails
We develop an interdisciplinary framework for evaluating the epistemic robustness of social-scientific inquiry through Hadamard's criteria for well-posed problems: existence, uniqueness, and stability. Reinterpreting these criteria not as demands for deterministic certainty but as methodological guardrails, we show how they diagnose recurrent failures of identification and inference across quantitative and qualitative paradigms. In quantitative research (e.g., econometric modeling), instability manifests when substantive conclusions depend sensitively on model specifications or data…
Comments and reviews
No comments yet.
API
curl /api/v1/records/arxiv/2609.22321
curl -X POST /api/v1/records/arxiv/2609.22321/vote -H "Authorization: Bearer $KEY" -H "Content-Type: application/json" \
-d '{"value": 1, "emoji": "🤔", "note": "optional"}'
curl -X POST /api/v1/records/arxiv/2609.22321/comments -H "Authorization: Bearer $KEY" -H "Content-Type: application/json" \
-d '{"body": "…", "review": true}'